JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================hK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?|42([dc,{ӅyݯŻ)ng r]W\[xPø4kguX<c3>>[ku>?SqlnN9je+NMrf=V5~ ]NnKǴqӞ?u 2] pqv+>XU 0ʞL_}&)-dYGUp:JY"xr: jËLJ"gt$zN.>/P*b8ذawicojl8R\A]%D?Lqxk+IN~%5a%4m/BpL6=pdQTg1kY$@<+XŵŖn-8cԚuԐc*n@gI"6PyZsh-\!+ ;]Wqҫ麤q<2ӌzUp$B[VIV%y7aIt\`sZ_4!|ǗnyբwW3˕5Y>NJ{YnOJSF]UA_]OQ|+ژ.<-CWMBݕ CwW]dTB~bqn*͚|_)jc?gڥD~ ;D7̨>f8s}sd q|O[td`]|Tz9yi8qzm r{kݾJxKW\s=C^Am%2ndd7s m8z/@#5{$L!ILtٯoⲃ 4zs:8,6J_O|l0" ?:`v`l`!9f'%:k-ҳA5mVX]  :M&f9 dSܳ/N㊍iL1sװXj:r_@B팷dr>|Tmnsbe 25ݔK(?w/$c+. SL#ѷ{6Ny[xW yHcT~Ua(InUݬx܃ FGZ|/E:r-?&%Xp˅O\SB9CW>TS'#qu 9aKP@VANOV:fKk,Eba)Ae%`cǾ@)Zcu/qRFSj@BH]į֘Bsފ)!5E= RDjN5:ƜǵR)}L=P q4Then, on a whistle, everyone begins their second set together at the same time and so on.<br><br>What are the advantages, if any? Each core lift has its own unique time constraints. For example, the Parallel Squat takes longer than the Bench Press to complete the same number of sets. Therefore, if you have four squat stations and four bench stations with a system of rotating from one to another you can run into challenges. Your athletes doing the bench get done with their sets before the athletes who are squatting. What do you do? Well, they could stretch, do a burnout set or do an auxiliary lift. So it does not need to be unproductive or a waste. However, with the one station-do it all concept, there is more efficiency. Your coaching becomes easier because everyone is doing the same lift. Your time management becomes more precise and controlled. The athletes could get more intense if a competitive atmosphere were created with everyone doing the same lift. Finally, in most cases, the one station approach can save space.<br><br>What are the disadvantages, if any? I can think of only two. First, the cost. The transition from one appr